PCPC supports our member companies’ strong commitment to product safety and environmental stewardship, including protection of the marine environment that sustains life on our planet. That’s why we responded early and aggressively to concerns about microbeads and their presence in oceans and waterways.
In 2014, the industry announced a voluntary phase-out of microbeads in the U.S., followed by a similar action in Europe a year later. PCPC worked with elected officials, regulatory authorities and environmental advocacy groups to support laws and regulation that permanently ban microbeads from use in the U.S. The Microbead-Free Waters Act, signed into law by President Obama in 2015, prohibits the manufacture of rinse-off products containing microbeads, effective July 1, 2017.
Microbeads are defined as any intentionally added, 5 mm or less, solid plastic particle used to exfoliate or cleanse in rinse-off personal care products or toothpaste. Historically, they were used in rinse-off cleansing products because of their safe and effective exfoliating properties that helped to remove dry, dead cells from the surface of the skin as well as unclog pores.
Science & Safety
Plastic microbeads are a type of microplastic, defined as any type of tiny, solid plastic particle or fiber found as litter in oceans and other waterways. Microplastic most often starts as larger pieces of plastic debris, such as plastic packaging, cigarette filters, car tires or synthetic fabric that breaks down into tiny pieces over time.
According to a 2016 report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the use of microplastics in personal care and cosmetics products is not a significant source of environmental pollution, “especially compared with other sources of primary and secondary microplastics,” such as plastic packaging, cigarette filters, car tires, or synthetic fabric that breaks down into tiny pieces over time. These conclusions along with the findings of other studies, show that microbeads in personal care and cosmetics products make up a mere 0.1-1.5 percent of all microplastic pollution.
Our members take their role as environmental stewards very seriously. As a result, they voluntarily committed to replace solid plastic microbeads, even before bans were legally implemented. Alternative materials used as replacements include beeswax; rice bran wax; jojoba waxes; starches derived from corn, tapioca, and carnauba; seaweed; silica; clay; and other natural compounds.
Science Plastic Task Force
PCPC’s task force works to define and distinguish microbeads, microplastic, waxes and polymers in cosmetics; apply an environmental risk assessment approach; and identify a strategy that expeditiously drives a science-based approach to protect the use of materials that are respectful to the environment. Led by our Chief Scientist Alex Kowcz and Senior Environmental Scientist Dr. Iain Davies, members are required to have appropriate technical expertise in the subject matter.
- Statement by Beth Lange, Ph.D., Chief Scientist Personal Care Products Council On Latest Report by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) “Marine Debris and Microplastics”: May 31, 2016
- Statement by Lezlee Westine, President and CEO Personal Care Products Council In Response to U.S. Senate Passage of Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015: December 18, 2015
- CosmeticsInfo.org: Plastic Microbeads
- CosmeticsInfo.org: Understanding Microplastic Litter [Infographic]
- Media Coverage
- Facing Facts on Microbeads, Medium, May 3, 2016
- Marine Debris Myth Busters: Are Microbeads Really A Macro Problem?, Awesome Ocean
- Gouin, T., Roche, N., Lohmann, R., Hodges, G., 2011. A Thermodynamic Approach for Assessing the Environmental Exposure of Chemicals Absorbed to Microplastic. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 1466–1472.
- Eunomia (2016). Plastics in the Marine Environment. Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd, Bristol UK, June 2016.